U4 Brief
Collective donor responses: Barking or biting?
In 2006, the OECD Development Assistance Committee Ministers of Development expressed a desire to move towards more effective collective responses to corruption. However, donors have continued to struggle with responding robustly to corruption cases. Donors cannot afford to continue to respond in a haphazard, inconsistent, and poorly planned fashion. Attention should be invested into how to respond to corruption cases in a manner that has a strategic focus beyond getting the money back. This means preparing a coordinated response; acting consistently and predictably; and maintaining a dialogue with multiple partners including non-state actors.
![Collective donor responses: Barking or biting?](https://cdn.sanity.io/images/1f1lcoov/production/994635cd91982a794e51cdaf773a29b653636e5a-1504x2128.png?auto=format&w=3840&q=75&fit=max)
Cite this publication
de Vibe, M. ; Taxell, N. (2014) Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Brief 2014:4) 4 p.
Disclaimer
All views in this text are the author(s)’, and may differ from the U4 partner agencies’ policies.
This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)